<- Return to List

The 9/11 Operation: A SummaryThe 9/11 operation consisted of the following activities: Military exercises by the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) with 22 imaginarily hijacked planes on 9/11/2001, before and simultaneously with the “real” hijackings. Some of the defense interceptors flew to Alaska, as far as possible from the
cities that were being attacked. All FAA Flight Termination Systems (FTS) were deactivated so that no “false groundings” of commercial planes would occur. The operation involved the “hijackings” of four civilian aircraft, then substituting them with remote-controlled USAF aircraft or “drones”. It is certain that an operation this complex and sophisticated (even in the preparations of the demolition charges at the WTC) is not left to be handled by Arab lackeys armed only with carpeting knives. Plissken-Valentine, FTS by SPC or Pearl are well-documented available technologies on how the aircraft/attack portion of the operation was performed. Since the part of airplanes hijacked and flown into buildings was critical to the real aims of the operation there must have been a couple of reserve planes for the USAF – Boeing 767’s and the Global Hawk. Alternatively, the Boeing 757 shot down in Pennsylvania might well have been a remotecontrolled reserve plane utilized because of the NORAD exercises. The booking of seats on certain pre-ordained flights was artificially kept low; those coastto-coast flights were booked by 20% instead of the usual 75% in order to minimize deaths, which could cause problems if ‘highly connected” individuals were wantonly sacrificed. If the flights were real, the passengers on them had to die (or at least disappear). Two of the flights were probably nothing but fictitious, real only on radar screens, which minimized the amount of passengers to be murdered. There was indeed placing of well executed put options with airline stocks and with specific re-assurance companies (American Airlines, United Airlines, Allianz, Munchener Re, Schweizer Re, AXA, Furthermore, the assurance values of the WTC were doubled in July 2001, at the same time the MOSSAD?s offices at the WTC were vacated. Bush’s Carlyle Group members were beneficiaries of these options ; a very vital set of “smoking gun clues” that were completely ignored or conveniently
forgotten by official ?investigators? in the days, weeks, and months following thejoint
CIA/Mossad operation. The camouflaging of six remote-controlled aircraft in order to make them look like Boeing 767’s or 757’s. The four planes probably were 2x USAF 767 tankers, a Global
Hawk used to hit the Pentagon and a ?real?757 shot out of the air in Pennsylvania. False tracks leading to “terrorists” using young Moslem-looking persons on CIA payroll, who take aviation classes in Southern USA and party at night clubs, were created. Demolition preparations of the wing of the Pentagon that was under reparation. This was designed to collapse a horseshoe-shaped area of the building, which would seem to be caused by the crash of a Boeing 757 instead of the Global Hawk attack. This partly failed. There is photographic evidence of a small plane before the actual collapse of the wing of the Pentagon. The structures did not collapse until firefighters sprayed lots of water on the ceiling of the building. Sophisticated demolition charge preparations of the WTC towers and WTC 7 to make
them collapse completely and look to the untrained, gullible eye as if the buildings
collapsed solely from the effects of gravity and burning fuel. Also the positioning of an electronic homing device in the towers and in the Pentagon in order to ensure the accurate hits of the remote-controlled aircraft was needed. Extra napalm was supplied for dramatizing the effects of hits of airliners. The WTC buildings would have been
demolished in the exact same way completely with or without the airplanes hitting.
Ordering, preparing and transportation of the charges for the demolition of the WTC had
to be done, no small feat to say the least. Solely for the steel pillars of the outer circle 40
x 240 charges were needed, let’s say 10,000 thermite cutting charges each weighing 50
lbs for each tower. For WTC 7 at least 4000 charges were needed. Also at least one small
thermonuclear hydrogen bomb for each of these three buildings was prepared. (Did the
9/11 ?investigators? check intoany demolition charge purchases over the prior year?)
Identifying critical need targets for the conspiracy in the WTC towers various offices. For
example, there was a lot of evidence being gathered of world-wide economic crimes by
Neocon Zionists. The FBI?s international divisionwas located in WTC 1 in the floors
from 22 to 24. (One case being investigated was the case against Mobil Oil and James
Giffen on illegal oil swaps between Iran and Kazakhstan brokered by Mobil Oil and
Carlyle Group in Texas; also the ongoing evidence in the investigation of gold price
fixing stemming from charges pending to go to Federal Grand Jury seeking indictments
against Alan Greenspan, JP Morgan & Company, Rothschild & Sons, and Goldman
Sachs.) The CIA maintained a large operations office in WTC 7. It is possible that some
targets were attacked because of the unique opportunity exploitable where the human
bodies and all evidence of the crimes automatically disappeared when a hydrogen bomb
exploded. Explosions heard from the towers before the commencing of the ?collapse?
may have been related to these attacks. There is a reason for the huge explosion in the
customs building, as well.
1) Calculate the correct size and the dimensions of suitable cutting charges and then order
24,000 pieces. Must also order fitting detonators (custom detonators had to be
manufactured). Fitting detonators usually already exist in stores of military forces (as
well as the CIA?s ?Covert Labs?). Time of delivery is several months in any case. All
detonators must be equipped with some kind of safety mechanism, which will be
removed by a radio signal at the final moment.
2) After procurement, the cutting charges are installed in selected vacant rooms and
Do Not Copy
elevator/maintenance shafts. Some of these rooms also served as temporary storages for
charges needed elsewhere. After the charges are set, the office is renovated and circulated
to the clients in the WTC. One man continuously assembles maybe 5 cutting charges per
hour. With 10 assemblers 350 charges are assembled and installed a day. Maybe about
20 people more were needed (5 of them know what is going on, 15 do not). For the
installation of the charges this operation takes at least four months with 30 men.
Considering step 1), six months are probably needed. The amount of personnel could not
have been increased, but probably decreased, if more time was available.
3) To some of the chosen office complexes, no one had access. That is why on the
weekend on 9/8/2001 and 9/9/2001 it is announced, that floors up from the 40th floor are
being equipped with new cables and no ?normal employee? hadaccess to the working
area there. The installations of explosives are completed and at the same time (at least in
the charged areas) listening devices are set to find out a possible premature discovery of
the plan. If someone finds charges the guards are soon on the scene and will deal with the
situation in one way or another.
4) One completes the area of secret service in WTC 7 so that its demolition operation can
be carried out. A military flight beacon is placed there (planes are homing to it from far
away). Remote controls for air planes and radio transmitters to be capable of blowing up
at least one third of the cutting charges are placed. At this location, the ability to
eavesdrop any area of the WTC, for example by a laser beam, aimed to a selected
window, probably already existed.
5) A radio beacon helping the final approach is placed in targeted offices in the WTC
towers. Close to these, remote controlled napalm explosives are placed as well, in order
to draw the interest from the planes to fires. The higher in the towers the planes are
targeted, the less death would result. (Real terrorists would do exactly the opposite.)
Evacuation from lower floors should be possible through the staircases. The target is to
create a new reason for odd wars and fascistic laws, not to kill as many Americans as
possible. ?A new Pearl Harbor?, meaning the death of about 3000 unsuspecting, innocent
citizens is the desired loss of lives.
6) The attack plans are made so that they can be executed during the chaos, for example
in the offices of the investigations of the economic crimes by the FBI. (The attackers had
already placed or infiltrated their own men in these facilities.) Also in WTC 6 (customs)
either a small nuke or a very strong bomb is also detonated (which one, depends on
whether there was melted steel ponds in the cellar of WTC 6.) An explosion, of course,
hides the loss of any supplies. (A nuclear explosion covers up murders, as well.)
7) In the morning of 9/11 the operations are performed after a timetable in which seconds
are important. From the command post facilities the actions in towers are monitored. To
hide the true nature of the operation, there was probably an agent on call in both towers,
who could silence the people finding out too much. (The agent probably did not know
what was going to happen.)
Do Not Copy
It is highly unlikely that the people who knew about the demolition charges in the WTC,
or those who installed the remote controls of the aircraft or did some camouflage
paintings for drones are still are alive and capable of telling about their acts, which
changed the world.
8) The mini-nukes are transported to the basement floors in elevators. After that the
elevators are locked down, guarded and monitored – no service repairman will be allowed
near these elevators. The thermonuclear device used in WTC 7 was different, its yield
was set lower and it was directed in a way better suitable for that building.
9) The explosions have been timed so that 99.9% of people around will look at the top of
towers, and perhaps two seconds later the small thermonuclear bomb is exploded in the
cellar of the south tower, and again two seconds later another very powerful charge in the
WTC 6 customs building while nobody is looking that way. There are also the continuous
explosions of the thousands of cutting charges tearing the south tower down to coincide
with the speed of gravity-driven free fall.
10) The demolition of either of the WTC towers took at least half a year to prepare,
including installation of 10,000 cutting charges and the delivery of a thermonuclear
device at the last moment. The demolition of those ultra strong steel pillars in the central
core using cutting charges only is not possible without waking up unwanted attention.
These charges must be in touch with the steel pillars, and there is not enough enclosed
space in the central core itself to hide these biggest possible charges.
11) The demolition operation is finished by destroying WTC 7 using a nuke and
completely destroying the op center with its equipment. Concrete evidence like the
military flight beacon and the remote control devices for cutting charges and napalm as
well as the recordings of eavesdropping devices regarding events within the towers
vaporize and vanish without a trace.
Most of the media is controlled by people related to the attack and tell misleading stories
only, as if crushing of the airliners or a weak fire could have caused the ?collapse?of the
towers. The true attackers are the ones with strong and vigorous broadcasting around
their false version of the events which is very different to what really happened.
No single ?mainstream?newspaper, magazine nor any national TV channel in the
western nations has taken a critical, questioning view on the so-called ?official truth?, i.e.
the planes collision and resulting fires caused the WTC towers to collapse. The
destruction of WTC 7, which has no explanation at all (not hit by jets, or fiery debris), is
bypassed totally and completely without any comments. A huge bomb of some sort,
detonated in WTC 6 is also bypassed as a ?non-existing event?.
Do Not Copy
Some things, like the sharply-drawn pictures of the closest seismographs may have been
falsified. A Specialist in demolitions, V. Romero, may have been forced to change his
original statement. The hoax is completed by Osama Bin Laden, who as a CIA agent
?confesses?to have ordered the airliner strikes. The Bin Laden hoax and the suicidal
Arabs construct a net of lies that fools the vast majority of mankind.
Laymen have no experience in observing differences in collapses, controlled demolitions
and underground nuclear demolitions. Even the destruction of heavy steel constructions
or typical fire damage are far away from their field of experience. These towers were
built and professionally engineered to take the impacts of hitting Boeing 707’s,
comparable to Boeing 767’s, taking into account the fires caused by the burning aviation
fuel. In fact, the buildings did in fact survive all of that. They stood firm for nearly an
hour, until they were demolished. (NYFD personnel are trained on the structural
stabilities of the cities? high rise buildings. If there was a clear and present danger of
?collapse? it is unlikely the firemen would have been ordered into the building.)
The knowledge of relevant advances regarding weapon technology is even rarer. Many of
those who are up to date are bound by strict commitment of loyalty and secrecy, that is
strictly enforced. In some cases, they get executed for talking (an ?accident?occurs).
The author of this text feels it is his duty to spread his advanced knowledge in explosives
from a military point of view via public discussion as it is obvious that the public is
lacking this information. The events observed around 9/11 cannot be rationally explained
any other way.
The photographs attached in this non-profit distribution are for securing volatile,
important evidence on 9/11 for discussion and education. Author hereby grants
full permission to reproduce the drawing ‘The Bombs in the WTC’ and his
writings. You are encouraged to mail, publish and mass produce these
documents or your enhanced versions of them.
Do Not Copy
The Album Cover of ?Party Music? by the aptly named punk rock band ?The Coup?. Party
Music CD Design was printed in July and was scheduled for release ?after Labor Day?
during the week of 9/11/01 ?immediately the album was pulled from store shelves on 9/12.
(Notice the ?Covert Labs?(i.e. CIA Issue) detonator, Soviet ?Red Star? or ?Red Shield?
(Rothschild) logo and the ?location? of the explosive charges. Notice also the smug smirk
Do Not Copy
CD Jacket of the Coup?s ?Party Music??Combined with the CD Graphics on the cover, and
the two planes on the jacket ?considering that this CD was recorded 6 months prior to
?ANGELICA 01?? Was this the ?telefon? coding for the CIA ?activation command? for
certain ?Manchurian Candidates??
Do Not Copy
The Bombs in the WTC
(Schematic Provided by Anonymous ?Insider?)
The Ground Zero here is in the original sense of the word, a nuclear blast site.
The thermal energy may absorb heat at a rate of 10 E 23 ergs / cm2 sec and
near the bomb all surfaces may heat to 4000 ?C or 7200 ?F igniting or vaporizing
violently. Sources: US Department of Defense & US Department of Energy,
Glasstone ?Dolan: ‘The Effects of Nuclear Weapons’ (1980).
The thermonuclear bomb used was a ?pure?hydrogen bomb; no uranium or
plutonium was used at all. The basic nuclear reaction is Deuterium + Tritium >
Alpha + n. The ignition of this is the tricky part, either a powerful beam array or
antimatter detonator was likely used (a very certain way to get the necessary
effect of directed energy in order not to level the adjacent blocks of high-rise
buildings as well).
Do Not Copy
The Development of Bomb
Technology Related to the 9/11
These outlines of developments in military bomb technology have been written to
give the layman some idea, why bomb technology has developed into what it is.
A hollow charge: a small charge designed to make a hole in armor plate was
invented in Switzerland in 1937. A cutting charge, used in the WTC in tens of
thousands of pieces, was an evolutionary model of the principles of a hollow
charge from 1950’s.
A Claymore threw steel balls towards the enemy, but was otherwise harmless
even from 5 meters distance, was developed in the USA approximately in 1960.
A flank mine is able to direct a narrow pressure wave through AFV flanks from a
distance of 20 meters and was developed in Finland around 1970. Due to
efficiency needs, a growing part of military explosives deploy improvements
utilizing directed explosion energy.
By controlling several layers of the explosion fronts the size of a nuclear bomb
has been minimized during the 1960’s (fission forcing implosion). After that, the
control of explosion force in nuclear explosions was developed. Too strong an
explosion is sometimes unusable and undesirable, for example when the enemy
have broken the front and advanced too close to friendly cities.
While looking for a bomb with a small size and a strong effect, a 100% pure
hydrogen bomb was an obvious solution. When no atomic device is needed for
igniting, the size of the hydrogen bomb gets even smaller and the yield (effect)
can be set within a wide range, for example between from 1 to 100. This new
technology was perfected in the 1980’s, as well as the neutron bomb, which kills
only living things while it leaves most inert material untouched.
The former Soviet Union is said to have had more than 500 command centers
durable for repelling a small nuke attack. That led into the developing of different
types of bunker buster explosives. A working solution the U.S. military developed
is a nuclear missile that directs 96% of its yield into a thin, all penetrating
heat+blast wave in a concentrated, specific direction, tunneling hundreds of
meters downwards into and melting solid rock. This type of a hydrogen bomb
was developed and perfected sometime in the early 1990’s. Nowadays, both the
yield and the direction of the destructive force of a small tactical hydrogen bomb
can be somewhat controlled. The amount of fusion-able materials control the
Do Not Copy
yield (effect) and the shape of the charge as well as the initiation arrangements
impress the direction of the explosion wave.
Observations Suggesting the Use of
Small Hydrogen Bombs
1) The concrete pulverized into fine dust, 70 – 300 micron particles (this alone
would take massively more energy to produce than merely the total gravitational
energy available from the earth?s gravitational field).
2) Very energetic dust (radiating heat) after the explosions. (Demolition charges
using thermite or other demolition explosives would produce white clouds of dust,
which would not move much, and a gravity-driven collapse would produce much
less and more coarse dust. Only a thermo-nuke would provide the kinetic energy
to produce such ?hot-to-the-touch? flour-fine dust particles.)
3) Variable brown shades of color was seen in the air ?these ?brown clouds?are
typically produced by nuclear reactions of a thermonuclear device. The reactions
use gamma radiation caused by free neutrons, N2, O2, H2O > nitrid acid, NO2,
NO3 which in turn provide brown colored clouds after detonation. These clouds
Do Not Copy
soon get their usual white color after some minutes as the heat and fast
movement of the clouds cease.
Note: many of the pictures taken regarding the WTC Towers and the clouds
seem to have been developed too artificially blue in color, replacing the shades
of brown seen and remembered by eyewitnesses. (This may have been an
attempt to suppress the evidence.) Also there was supposed to be 200,000+
gallons of water on the roof of each tower ?this water was spilled into stairwells
etc, but was later all converted into water vapor reducing the brown color.
4) Superheated steel objects, disintegrating into steel vapor. Molten ponds of
steel were found in the elevator shafts. There were lots of burned cars in the
parking areas of the towers. The fire department did not announce until
12/19/2001 that the fires under the WTC rubble have been extinguished (more
than 3 months after the incident).
Do Not Copy
location F C name
A 1341 727 WTC7
B 1034 557 WTC7
C 1161 627 WTC1
D 963 517 WTC1
E 819 437 WTC3
F 801 427 WTC2
G 1377 747 WTC2
H 1017 547 WTC4
Thermal Survey of the WTC 9/16/2001 (NASA /US Geological Survey). Despite
the fire department efforts to cool the rubble, molten metals would still be
extremely hot (up to 1377 degrees F) in some sites 5 days after the incident.
Burning jet fuel remnants (especially diesel fuel in Location A ?Bldg. 7) would
never be this ?hot? after 5 days. However, thermo-nuke residue remains ?hot? for
many days.
Red-hot, semi-molten metal pulled from the base of WTC building 7 in late October,
6 full weeks after it collapsed, (no plane collided with it, and it was still standing
unscathed hours after the twin towers had already collapsed).
Do Not Copy
WTC 7 on afternoon of 9-11-01. WTC 7 is the tall
sky-scraper in the back-ground, right. Seen from WTC 1 area. The ?Shock and Awe? of
the Nation over the towers?collapse likely precluded rational questioning about WTC 7.
5) Elevated values of tritium were recorded in locations A-H, but not found
anywhere else in New York. The University of California found elevated values
on 9/13/2001 and 9/21/2001 but only within the boundaries of the WTC. They
found the elevated levels of tritium ?harmless? to human health. Again, in a pure
hydrogen bomb isotopes of hydrogen are fused (D + T > n + a + 17.6 MeV).
6) An Electro-Magnetic Pulse (EMP-type) phenomenon blacked out GSM
phones, cell phones, fax machines and rescue personnel?s radiosat the exact
moment when the first (southern) tower started to ?fall down?, i.e. at the exact
moment when a small thermonuclear bomb was detonated. This is why rescuing
firefighters were not warned to evacuate ?their radios had mysteriously quit
working. A strangely eerie afterglow was seen in the late phase of the ?collapse?
Do Not Copy
of both of the towers.
7) A wave of pressure was witnessed in the root or lower basement of the tower
at the moment when the so-called collapse was beginning. The blast wave
knocked over a photographer and a fireman close to the entrance, who was
taking photos of the dust cloud. The burst of the dust cloud at the root of the
tower was photographed as well. In the image on the left below is what probably
was the explosion of WTC 6. The Customs building was deliberately exploded for
some reason – it was not damaged because of the falling girders as they had not
yet reached the roof of WTC 7 when the photo was taken. A couple of seconds
later the clouds of the explosion were already partly above the roof of WTC 7,
again, this was much too high-powered to be caused by typical blasting agents,
including thermite ?not to mention gravitational energy. This suggests it was the
second hydrogen bomb in the WTC block. The first hydrogen bomb is
discharging upwards (pulverized concrete) exactly as shown in the picture, and
the steel structures vaporized by the bomb are already blowing out 100 meters
(approx. 328 ft.) farther down. The massive cloud, caused by vaporized steel
rising from the root and core of the building, is seen in the center of the picture
and even more clearly in the picture at the right.
Do Not Copy
8) In the basement level, out of all the 47 ultra strong steel pillars, the steel was
melted completely at the length of more than 20 meters (approx. 65 ft). Even cars
were melted and burned in the basement level at ?ground zero?. The pillars were
far too thick for such massive pulverization via thermite, which some have
suggested. An explosion of a thermonuclear bomb, on the other hand, explains
the phenomenon well. (How is it even remotely possible for rational people to
accept the ?official story?that burning jet fuel in the upper portion of the tower
melted steel columns and even cars in the basement level?)
9) Steel columns and pillars were ejected from the outer layers of the building. In
the beginning of the so-called collapse, no such natural, gravitational-based
energy exists that could throw steel pillars outwards from 60 to 175 meters
(approx. from 170 to 574 ft.) away from the trunk of the building. Not even the
most powerful cutting charges can do that. However, once again, a blast wave
from a small hydrogen bomb is very capable of doing just that.
How the Towers of the World Trade
Center collapsed
The airplanes did not affect the destruction of towers; they were needed instead
to give the ruling neocons an excuse for instigating their odd Orwellian wars,
while at the same time turning the USA into a police nation, much like the
German Third Reich, to some extent. The towers took and withstood the impacts
of crushing Boeing 767’s. The towers were originally built and engineered to take
impacts of Boeing 707’s, which are approximately of the same size and were
widely used in the 1970’s.
Do Not Copy
Fires that burned from the fuel in the planes were too short-lasting and weak to
be able to severely damage the structural integrity of the skyscrapers. Even in
the most extreme situation, the heat from a kerosene fire cannot threaten the
durability of a steel trunk. The temperature of carbon-based fires reach only 825
?C (approx. 1517 ?F) in ?ideal? enclosed furnace conditions, steel weakens at 800
?C (approx. 1470 ?F) but does not actually become molten until a temperature of
1585 ?C (approx. 2890 ?F) is reached. In the skyscrapers of the WTC the
environment simply was not at all ?ideal?as there were far too many steel
columns which were purposefully engineered to channel heat away from the
burning area. WTC 1 burned for 102 minutes and WTC 2 for 56 minutes only. A
fire burning much longer, from 10 to 20 hours in a purely ideal environment could
theoretically slowly increase the burning temperature to perhaps 1100 ?C
(approx. 2010 ?F). But that is only if there is more fuel and gasses to burn; such a
fire will damage concrete and irons, but not severely damage or ?melt? heavy
steel construction beams and girders. Again, a fire ignited by a finite amount of
jet fuel would simply not ?melt? steel columns.
For example, in mid-February in Madrid, Spain, the Windsor Tower (see above)
burned for over 20 hours, which created a fire many times hotter and more
destructive to metal than that in the WTC, but even the damage to the Windsor
Tower caused by the very strong and long-enduring fire were comparatively
minimal and limited to the upper floors ?and of course, it did not melt the hotel?s
steel girders. Like the Windsor Towers, if either of the WTC towers had started to
collapse because of fires the collapse would have been limited to only a few of
the floors and then stopped as the fire became contained.
Do Not Copy
The complete and total impossibility of a ?gravitational collapse?is closer seen in
other documents. A gravitational collapse would produce large pieces of rubble,
and a non-symmetrical toppling of the structure. Furthermore, ?gravitational
collapse? simply does not explain the pulverization of fine dust from concrete, the
vast amounts of micron-fine ?powdered?dust that was hot to the touch, and
pieces of steel ejected outwards over 500 feet.
Destruction of the towers by explosions is furthermore clear according to the
photographs and reports of the eye witnesses. In the picture below, a range of
cutting charges have just exploded in the down left sector and a typical white
cloud is formed outwards from the wall. Down right, explosions are seen as well.
Even a detonation flame is seen, many stories below the point of impact.
In video tapes taken of the planned demolition of the WTC, more explosions of
these cutting charges can clearly be seen. The explosions advance quickly, with
a gap of a couple of floors, cutting the strong steel pillars in the outer wall. The
explosions are skillfully timed so that it appears that the tower collapses occur in
the same timing as in a gravitational collapse. The explosions are not completely
synchronized in timing, probably a few charges are triggered by radio, and other
charges explode out of the impulses of one of these charges (infrared, pressure
Do Not Copy
More challenging problems to the demolition men, however, were the reinforced
steel central cores of the buildings and the 47 steel pillars more robust even than
the ones on the outer rounds. The pillars of the central cores were made of steel
100 + 100 mm thick, much thicker than the side armors of a battle tank. Cutting
those, even with explosives, is extremely difficult. One would need to surround
the whole pillars, every single pillar on every floor blasted with powerful cutting
charges. These charges would have needed to be placed in such a way that the
inhabitants of the skyscrapers could not notice these preparations.
As seen in the following pictures, the cores of the towers were not destroyed by
thousands of powerful cutting charges of thermite as were the surrounding
beams, but rather by a modern thermonuclear explosive, a small hydrogen
bomb. In the picture below, a hydrogen bomb explosion, the bomb having been
placed in the lowest basement level and directed to the core, shows the resulting
energy wave has reached the roof of the tower and the upper parts of the outer
walls. On its way up, the waves of intense hydro-fire pressure partially penetrated
about 100 floors of concrete and steel. Over ten million degrees of heat created
by such a hydrogen bomb sublimated all water within the concrete in seconds.
The water (or more specifically the Hydrogen content in the concrete) exploded
extremely quickly into 24-fold volume which then totally pulverized the concrete
and steel into a fine, white, and ?hot? flour-like powder. All people, all office
equipment and computers that were in the buildings immediately vaporized,
turning instantly into heat and light. That is why almost no human remains of the
nearly 3,000 victims and/or any recognizable office equipment residue was found
in the ruins ? yet thousands of offices were supposedly only ?collapsed?from
gravity. Where are the human remains of the victims??
Also, thermonuclear radiation via hydrogen is absorbed in steel so quickly that
steel heats up immediately well over its melting point 1585 ?C (approx. 2890 ?F)
and also above its boiling point around 3000 C (approx. 5430 ?F). In the pictures
shown below, super hot groups of steel pillars and columns, torn from their walls
by the nuclear pressure wave, are instantly sublimated. They immediately turn
into a vaporized form, binding heat is then released as quickly as possible.
Upwardly blooming blast clouds (a mini mushroom), are clearly visible in the
picture below. Clearly, this can not be possible for a mere gravitational collapse
or even for cutting charges which are used for energy release horizontally.
Do Not Copy
Here you see the brown ?energy cloud? of the explosion extending well over 63
meters in either direction of the 63 meter wide tower. This incredibly potent
energy wave could not have been produced by a mere gravitational ?collapse?.
Do Not Copy
Storax Sedan 104 Kt shallow underground hydrogen bomb (100 times larger
than the WTC nuke but yet showing the same energy release characteristics).
In the upper picture the explosion is in theory 100 times stronger than in the
picture below, but in practice the difference is only four times due to the
?capability of direction?of the small hydrogen bomb along a prescribed ?corridor?
such as the base columns of the WTC Towers.
Do Not Copy
Do Not Copy
In the picture at the right, the brown shades caused by a hydrogen bomb are
seen, while the top of the tower that is already collapsing is breaking down and
the posture straightens up as the hydrogen bomb pulverized the core as it has
lost all its resistance. The piles point the blasts of the cutting charges.
Do Not Copy
Do Not Copy
Steel pillars are turned into
Extremely hot, sublimating
pieces are not created by too
many demolition methods.
For comparison, pictures of subterranean nuclear explosions where the
explosion is blasting onto surface and into the air:
Do Not Copy
Ess1.2 Kt
WTC 2 Banberry 10 Kt underground
Radioactivity released in the air creates shades of brown as the Electro-Magnetic
Pulse knocks out all electrical devices within a specific, defined radius of the
Do Not Copy
blast. (The subterranean nuke in the picture on the right is 10 times stronger than
the small nuke on the left.) This is the primary reason why the FBI did not search
the crime scene, and why the area was immediately cordoned off from the
general public. Ground zeros of nuclear weapons are a public health risk and
belong exclusively to the ?experts? ofFEMA.
Furthermore, normal fiery jet fuel conflagrations and planned demolitions do not
remain extremely ?hot? 5 to 10 days after the fires have been extinguished.
However, hydrogen bomb sites remain thermally reactive and ?hot? for days and
even weeks. This is clearly demonstrated by the USGS calibrations of the WTC
Images of the World Trade Center Site Show Thermal Hot Spots on
September 16 and 23, 2001. (Downloaded directly from the USGS
Website ?with their commentary and explanation.)
Results of Airborne Visible/Infrared Imaging Spectrometer (AVIRIS)
remote sensing data and interpretations show the distribution and intensity
of thermal hot spots in the area in and around the World Trade Center on
September 16 and 23, 2001. Data collected on the 16th were processed,
interpreted and released to emergency response teams on the 18th of
September, 2001. The September 23 data were processed, interpreted and
the results released on October 12, 2001. The images of the World Trade
Center site show significant thermal hot spots on Sept. 16, 2001. By Sept.
23, 2001, most of the hot spots had cooled or the fires had been put out.
The AVIRIS instrument is a National Aeronautics and Space
Administration (NASA) remote sensing instrument that measures upwelling
spectral radiance in the visible through short-wavelength infrared. The
instrument has 224 spectral channels (bands) with wavelengths from 0.37
to 2.5 microns (micrometers).
In response to requests from the EPA through the USGS, NASA flew
AVIRIS on a De Havilland Twin Otter over lower Manhattan at mid-day on
September 16 and 23, 2001. For these deployments, the Twin Otter was
flown at altitudes of 6,500 and 12,500 feet. The spectral data for the maps
shown here were measured at 6,500 feet and have a spatial resolution
(pixel spacing) of approximately 6 feet (2 meters).
AVIRIS records the near-infrared signature of heat remotely. The
accompanying maps are false color images that show the core affected
area around the World Trade Center. Initial analysis of these data revealed
a number of thermal hot spots on September 16 in the region where the
buildings collapsed 5 days earlier. Analysis of the data indicates
temperatures greater than 800oF. Over 3 dozen hot spots appear in the
core zone. By September 23, only 4, or possibly 5, hot spots are apparent,
with temperatures cooler than those on September 16 (Thermal Figure 1).
Do Not Copy
Thermal Figure 1. Hot spots show as orange and yellow areas.
Dozens of hot spots are seen on September 16, but most had cooled
or the fires had been put out by September 23.
The images (larger area shown below) also show vegetated areas as
green. Water appears blue, and the smoke from the fires appears as a light
blue haze. White and lighter blue areas are rooftops, roads, and concrete
as well as dust and debris from the collapsed buildings. Dust, probably
more than a millimeter thick, appears in shades of brown around the core
WTC area on the 16th.
On the September 16th, 2001 image (Thermal Figure 2), large areas
around the World Trade Centers show brownish colors, indicating the
debris. On September 20, 2001 there was a significant rain storm that
Do Not Copy
washed away some of the dusty debris. Reduction of the distribution of
dust/debris is apparent in the September 23 image (Thermal Figure 3),
and can be attributed to the cleanup effort along with the rain.
There are other red/orange spots that show in the images in the area
south of the World Trade Center zone. These are hot spots from chimneys
or heating exhaust vents and are normal and not other uncontrolled fires.
The AVIRIS data were processed at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL)
in Pasadena California where the data are calibrated to radiance and
corrected for aircraft yaw, pitch, and roll. Acquisition and calibration of
AVIRIS data at JPL are under the direction of Robert O. Green. The data
were then transmitted to the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), Imaging
Spectroscopy Group in Denver, Colorado, under the direction of Dr. Roger
N. Clark. Atmospheric and ground calibrations were applied to derive
apparent surface reflectance and maps were then made of surface
materials. The USGS imaging spectroscopy group includes Dr. Gregg
Swayze, Eric Livo, and Todd Hoefen.
Thermal Figure 2. AVIRIS image from September 16, 2001. Hot
spots show as orange and yellow areas. Yellow is hotter than red
(because of color mixing in the way the 3-color image was produced).
Do Not Copy
Thermal Figure 3. AVIRIS image from September 23, 2001. Only a
couple of hot spots remain in view.
Do Not Copy
Thermal Figure 4. Index for the locations of some of the hot spots observed on
September 16, 2001.
Temperature of the Hot Spots
Remote measurement of the temperature is difficult because the
source of the thermal emission can be less than the field of view of the
measuring instrument. In that case a thermal sensor has an ambiguous
solution: a hotter temperature of a smaller area or lower temperature of a
larger area can result in the same total received thermal radiation.
A spectrometer, however, overcomes the ambiguity problem above,
because the shape of the thermal spectrum can be used to derive a unique
temperature, and the intensity gives the area of the emitting source. If a
large enough spectral range is covered, a range of temperatures and the
area of each can be derived. In the near infrared spectral range of AVIRIS,
reflected solar radiation also contributes to the signal. The solution to the
generalized problem involving all these effects is given in Clark (1979).
We derived temperatures using two methods: calibrated radiance, and
derived reflectance following Clark’s (1979) methods. In derived
reflectance, thermal radiation is the Planck response divided by the solar
spectrum. This has several effects: 1) the data are corrected for
atmospheric absorption and scattering, 2) the reflected solar component
can be readily assessed and compensated for, and 3) the ratio of the
Black-Body response by the solar spectrum produces a very steep curve
that is readily distinguishable from reflected sunlight and reflectance of
surface materials.
Simple temperature derivation from derived reflectance is illustrated in
Thermal Figure 5a and b. Here the hot spot is assumed to fill the pixel. The
Do Not Copy
thermal response of hot spot A (from Thermal Figure 4) shows the AVIRIS
response higher than the 800 kelvin curve. The 800 Kelvin temperature is
a lower limit to the temperature. While the upper limit might be the 900
Kelvin curve, we see the slopes do not match. As temperatures increase,
the peak in Black Body emission moves to shorter wavelengths and the
slope of the curve decreases at positions on the short wavelength side of
the peak (the case here).
Hot spot C (Thermal Figure 5b) shows similar effects. For hot spots
covering the full area of the pixel, the temperature must be greater than
700 Kelvin. At about 1.3 microns, the model at 800 Kelvin matches the
AVIRIS data, but the 800 Kelvin curve has a higher slope. This indicates
the hot spot is smaller than the size of the pixel, but hotter than 800
Solutions that include reflected solar radiation, hot spot temperature
and hot spot area are shown in Thermal Figures 6a and b. Hot spot A,
which from Thermal Figure 5 has a temperature greater than 800 Kelvin, is
found to have a 1000 Kelvin temperature in a spot covering ~15% of a
pixel, or 0.56 square meter. Similarly, hot spot C is found to have a 900
kelvin temperature over 20% of a pixel, or 0.8 square meter.
The sensitivity of the solution of area and temperature is illustrated in
Thermal Figure 7. An excellent fit is obtained for hot spot C with a 900
Kelvin spot filling 20% of the pixel. At 1000 Kelvin, only 8% is required but
the fit is noticeably worse. For temperatures in the 800-1000 Kelvin range,
temperature accuracy is estimated to be ? 30 Kelvin and the area ? 5%.
For smaller spots, like spot G in Table 1, the temperature accuracy is
similar, but the accuracy on such small areas is approximately +5%, –
0.5%. For example, decreasing the temperature to 1000 Kelvin (from 1020
Kelvin) on spot G increases the fractional area to about 5%.
Positions, temperatures and equivalent areas for hot spots A-H are
given in Table 1 and the geometrically rectified location map is shown in
Thermal Figure 8.
Thermal Figure 5a.
Do Not Copy Thermal Figure 5b
Thermal Figure 6a
Thermal Figure 6b
Do Not Copy
Thermal Figure 7.
Table 1 Thermal Hot Spot Data
Location Temperature Area
N Latitude W Longitude (Kelvin) % FOV sq meter
A 40o 42′ 47.18″ 74o 00′ 41.43″ 1000 15 0.56
B 40o 42′ 47.14″ 74o 00′ 43.53″ 830 2 0.08
C 40o 42′ 42.89″ 74o 00′ 48.88″ 900 20 0.8
D 40o 42′ 41.99″ 74o 00′ 46.94″ 790 20 0.8
E 40o 42′ 40.58″ 74o 00′ 50.15″ 710 10 0.4
F 40o 42′ 38.74″ 74o 00′ 46.70″ 700 10 0.4
G 40o 42′ 39.94″ 74o 00′ 45.37″ 1020 1 0.04
H 40o 42′ 38.60″ 74o 00′ 43.51″ 820 2 0.08
Do Not Copy
Positions are in degrees-minutes-decimal seconds, datum WGS84.
Position accuracy is estimated to be approximately +/- 6 meters (18
Thermal Figure 8. Geometrically rectified image of the WTC core region showing hot
spot locations.


0 replies

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *